What Is A Square Root?
A square root of a number is a number with . Every positive number has two of them, so 53 has and .
The radical sign names only the principal (non-negative) root, so is one specific number. The number under the sign, 53 here, is called the radicand.
Where Does The Square Root Of 53 Appear, And Why Does It Matter?
The square root of 53 has a clean home on graph paper: it is the diagonal of a rectangle 2 units wide and 7 units tall. The Pythagoras theorem gives .
That makes an exact whole-number grid distance. For example, the distance between two points and is , and so is the distance from to .
This is not luck. By Fermat's theorem on sums of two squares, an odd prime is a sum of two squares exactly when it leaves remainder 1 on division by 4, and 53 does ().
It also shows up in simple measurement problems:
A square tile with area 53 cm² has sides of cm.
A circle with area has radius , since means .
Quick Reference Table
These are the square roots of every whole number from 49 to 64. Only the two ends are perfect squares, and is one of the few in this stretch that does not simplify at all.
Number | in simplest form | Decimal (4 dp) | Perfect square? |
|---|---|---|---|
49 | 7.0000 | Yes | |
50 | 7.0711 | No | |
51 | 7.1414 | No | |
52 | 7.2111 | No | |
53 | 7.2801 | No | |
54 | 7.3485 | No | |
55 | 7.4162 | No | |
56 | 7.4833 | No | |
57 | 7.5498 | No | |
58 | 7.6158 | No | |
59 | 7.6811 | No | |
60 | 7.7460 | No | |
61 | 7.8102 | No | |
62 | 7.8740 | No | |
63 | 7.9373 | No | |
64 | 8.0000 | Yes |
In this range each step of 1 in adds about to to the root. The gaps shrink as numbers grow, which is why square roots of larger numbers are easier to estimate closely.
Can The Square Root Of 53 Be Simplified?
No. The square root of 53 is already in simplest radical form, because 53 is one of the prime numbers and its only factors are 1 and 53.
Simplifying a radical means pulling out a perfect-square factor, as in . With 53 there is no square factor to pull out:
So the radical form, the simplified form and the exact form are all the same expression, . In exponent form it is .
The general method for numbers that do simplify is covered in simplifying radical expressions.
Is The Square Root Of 53 Rational Or Irrational?
The square root of 53 is irrational. A whole number has a rational square root only when it is one of the perfect squares, and 53 falls strictly between and .
A short proof makes the same point. Suppose with the fraction in lowest terms; squaring gives
Because 53 is prime and divides , it divides , so write . Then , which gives , so 53 divides too.
Now and share the factor 53, which contradicts "lowest terms". So is an irrational number, and every decimal or fraction you write for it is an approximation.
How Do You Find The Square Root Of 53?
Four methods give the decimal value, and they agree on . Long division gives guaranteed digits, estimation gives a quick answer, Heron's method gives many digits in two or three steps, and a calculator confirms it.
How Do You Find The Square Root Of 53 By Long Division?
The long division method finds one correct digit per round. It follows the same bring-down pattern as ordinary long division, except that each trial divisor is "double the root so far, then the new digit".
Write 53 as one pair and add zero pairs after the decimal point: .
Round | Number to divide into | Trial divisor new digit | Product | Remainder | Root so far |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 53 | 49 | 4 | 7 | |
2 | 400 | 284 | 116 | 7.2 | |
3 | 11600 | 11584 | 16 | 7.28 | |
4 | 1600 | 0 | 1600 | 7.280 | |
5 | 160000 | 145601 | 14399 | 7.2801 | |
6 | 1439900 | 0 | 1439900 | 7.28010 |
How each round works:
The largest square not above 53 is . Write 7 in the root; .
Bring down 00 to get 400. Double 7 to get 14; fits, but is too big.
Bring down 00 to get 11600. Double 72 to get 144; fits, but is too big.
Bring down 00 to get 1600. Double 728 to get 1456; even is too big, so the digit is 0.
Bring down 00 to get 160000. Double 7280 to get 14560; fits, but does not.
Bring down 00 to get 1439900. Double 72801 to get 145602; is too big, so the digit is 0 again.
So , and the remainder never reaches zero. To 4 decimal places, .
The Square Root Of 53 Is Between What Two Numbers?
The square root of 53 is between 7 and 8, because . It is nearer to 7, since 53 is 4 above 49 but 11 below 64.
Two quick estimates close in on it:
Linear estimate: 53 is 4 of the 15 steps from 49 to 64, so . That is about too low, because the square-root curve bends.
Averaging estimate: divide 53 by the first guess 7 to get , then average: . That is only about too high.
A squaring check tells you which side you are on: is just under 53, and is over. So .
How Does Heron's Method Find The Square Root Of 53?
Heron's method (also called the Babylonian method) improves a guess with one rule:
Start from :
Step | Exact fraction | Decimal | Its square |
|---|---|---|---|
7 | 49 | ||
7.285714 | 53.0816 | ||
7.2801120 | 53.0000314 | ||
(large fraction) | 7.2801098893 | 53.0000000000 (to 10 dp) |
The number of correct digits roughly doubles each step, as described in methods of computing square roots. The Newton-Raphson method on gives exactly the same rule.
Why Is Such A Good Fraction For The Square Root Of 53?
The fraction is off by only about , which is unusually close for such small numbers. The reason is that .
That is a solution of the negative Pell's equation , and Pell solutions are always excellent fractions for a square root. It is a nice fact to know, and it also explains why "7.28" is the most quoted short value of .
How Do You Check The Square Root Of 53 On A Calculator?
Type 53 and press the square-root key; the display reads . Check by squaring the 4-decimal value: , which is within of 53.
What Is The Square Root Of 53 Rounded To The Nearest Tenth, Hundredth And Integer?
The square root of 53 is to the nearest tenth, to the nearest hundredth and to the nearest integer. All three come from the long division digits .
Rounded to | Next digit | Result |
|---|---|---|
Nearest integer | 2 (tenths), below 5 | 7 |
Nearest tenth | 8 (hundredths), 5 or more | 7.3 |
Nearest hundredth | 0 (thousandths), below 5 | 7.28 |
Nearest thousandth | 1 (ten-thousandths), below 5 | 7.280 |
4 decimal places | 0 (fifth place), below 5 | 7.2801 |
The trailing zero in 7.280 matters. It tells the reader the value is correct to three decimal places, not just two.
Examples Of Square Root Of 53
Example 1
Evaluate to 4 decimal places.
Final answer: . Here happens to give the same digits, but with larger multipliers an early-rounded value drifts, so carry extra digits and round once.
Example 2
Estimate without a calculator.
Wrong path: split 53 into and take roots of each piece, .
Squaring shows the break straight away: , which is far above 53. A square root cannot be split across addition.
Correct path: bracket 53 between perfect squares and refine.
Final answer:
Example 3
Solve .
Final answer: or
Example 4
Find the distance between the points and .
Final answer: units
The step that gets skipped here is squaring the differences before adding them; adding gives the length of the path along the two sides, and a straight diagonal is always shorter than that.
Example 5
A square tile has an area of 53 cm². Find its side and its perimeter.
Final answer: side about 7.28 cm, perimeter about 29.12 cm
Example 6
Simplify .
Final answer:
Which Errors Cost Marks On The Square Root Of 53?
Mistake 1: Halving 53 Instead Of Taking Its Root
Where it slips in: Quick mental work, especially right after a lesson on halves and doubles.
Don't do this: Writing . That is , and .
The correct way: A square root asks "what number times itself gives 53?", so the answer has to sit between 7 and 8. The rusher who reads the radical sign as "split in two" catches the error the moment they square the answer, which is the habit worth building.
Mistake 2: Rounding Too Early
Where it slips in: Multi-step problems where appears in the middle, such as perimeters or distances.
Don't do this: Replacing with at the start, then squaring it and reporting instead of 53.
The correct way: Keep as a symbol until the last line, then round once. The memorizer who knows " is 7.28" is the student most likely to carry that short value through four steps and lose the final digit.
Mistake 3: Writing
Where it slips in: Mixing "the square root of 53" with "the solutions of ".
Don't do this: Treating the symbol as two numbers, which some summaries do when they write "the square root of 53 is ".
The correct way: is the single positive number ; the equation has two solutions, . Textbooks word this loosely, so it is worth tying the to equations and never to the symbol itself.
Where Can Students Get Extra Help With Square Roots?
Square roots of primes like 53 are where estimation, long division and radical rules all meet, so a gap in any one of them shows up here. A student who wants a teacher to walk through those steps live can work with an algebra tutor or a middle school math tutor.
For wider practice, help with algebra covers radicals alongside equations, and math classes online build the same skills in a live group.
Conclusion
The square root of 53 is , and it stays as because 53 is prime.
It lies between 7 and 8, rounds to 7.3 (tenth) and 7.28 (hundredth), and is irrational.
Long division gives , including rounds where the new digit is 0.
Geometrically, is the diagonal of a 2 by 7 rectangle, because .
The commonest errors are halving 53, rounding too early and writing in front of the radical sign.
Practice These Before Moving On
Between which two whole numbers does lie, and which is it closer to?
Simplify and give its value to 2 decimal places.
Find the distance between and .
Solve .
Simplify .
Answer to Question 1: between 7 and 8, closer to 7 (53 is 4 above 49 and 11 below 64)
Answer to Question 2:
Answer to Question 3:
Answer to Question 4: , so
Answer to Question 5:
If Question 2 felt hard, look back at the FAQ on : pull out the perfect square 100 first.
Want a live trainer to walk through more square-root problems with your child? Book a free demo class
Read More
Was this article helpful?
Your feedback helps us write better content