Arc Length of a Curve: Formula, Derivation & Examples

#Calculus
TL;DR
The arc length of a curve y=f(x)y = f(x) from x=ax = a to x=bx = b is L=∫ab1+(dydx)2,dxL = \int_a^b \sqrt{1 + \left(\frac{dy}{dx}\right)^2},dx. The formula comes from cutting the curve into tiny straight pieces, measuring each with the distance formula, and adding them up as the pieces shrink. For a curve given by parametric equations, the same idea gives L=∫t1t2(dxdt)2+(dydt)2,dtL = \int_{t_1}^{t_2} \sqrt{\left(\frac{dx}{dt}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{dy}{dt}\right)^2},dt.
BT
Bhanzu TeamLast updated on September 27, 202614 min read

What Is The Arc Length Of A Curve?

The arc length of a curve is the distance measured along the curve between two points, as if you unbent it into a straight string and laid a ruler beside it. For a smooth function y=f(x)y = f(x) whose derivative is continuous on [a,b][a, b], the arc length is:

L=∫ab1+(dydx)2,dxL = \int_a^b \sqrt{1 + \left(\frac{dy}{dx}\right)^2},dx

Sometimes the curve is easier to describe as x=g(y)x = g(y), a function of yy. Then you integrate with respect to yy instead, and the roles of the two variables swap:

L=∫cd1+(dxdy)2,dyL = \int_c^d \sqrt{1 + \left(\frac{dx}{dy}\right)^2},dy

Both forms say the same thing: the length is the integral of a stretch factor that measures how much longer the true curve is than a flat horizontal (or vertical) step. Where the curve is steep, the stretch factor is large; where the curve is flat, it is close to 11. The definite integral then adds every stretched step from one end to the other.

How Is The Arc Length Formula Derived?

The whole formula grows out of one picture: a curve, chopped into short segments, each of which is almost a straight line.

Split [a,b][a, b] into nn small sub-intervals of width Δx\Delta x. Over one sub-interval the curve rises by some amount Δy\Delta y. The straight segment joining the two endpoints of that little piece is the hypotenuse of a right triangle with legs Δx\Delta x and Δy\Delta y, so the distance formula, which is the Pythagoras theorem in disguise, gives its length:

Δs≈(Δx)2+(Δy)2\Delta s \approx \sqrt{(\Delta x)^2 + (\Delta y)^2}

Now factor Δx\Delta x out from under the root. That turns the raw vertical rise into a slope:

Δs≈1+(ΔyΔx)2;Δx\Delta s \approx \sqrt{1 + \left(\frac{\Delta y}{\Delta x}\right)^2};\Delta x

The total length is the sum of all these little hypotenuses, L≈∑1+(ΔyΔx)2,ΔxL \approx \sum \sqrt{1 + \left(\frac{\Delta y}{\Delta x}\right)^2},\Delta x. As the pieces shrink, Δx→0\Delta x \to 0, the ratio ΔyΔx\frac{\Delta y}{\Delta x} becomes the derivative dydx\frac{dy}{dx}, and the sum becomes an integral. That limit of a sum is exactly a Riemann sum turning into the definite integral:

L=∫ab1+(dydx)2,dxL = \int_a^b \sqrt{1 + \left(\frac{dy}{dx}\right)^2},dx

Geometrically, 1+(dy/dx)2,dx\sqrt{1 + (dy/dx)^2},dx is the length of the tiny slanted step the curve actually takes while xx advances by dxdx. Algebraically, it is the integrand you evaluate. The two readings are the same object seen from two sides.

What Is The Parametric Form Of Arc Length?

When both coordinates are written in terms of a parameter tt, as x=x(t)x = x(t) and y=y(t)y = y(t), the curve may loop, double back, or run vertically, so a single y=f(x)y = f(x) rule no longer fits. The derivation is the same, except each leg of the little triangle now comes from its own rate of change. Over a small step Δt\Delta t the point moves about Δx≈dxdt,Δt\Delta x \approx \frac{dx}{dt},\Delta t across and Δy≈dydt,Δt\Delta y \approx \frac{dy}{dt},\Delta t up. Feeding those into Δs=(Δx)2+(Δy)2\Delta s = \sqrt{(\Delta x)^2 + (\Delta y)^2} and factoring out Δt\Delta t gives the parametric arc length:

L=∫t1t2(dxdt)2+(dydt)2,dtL = \int_{t_1}^{t_2} \sqrt{\left(\frac{dx}{dt}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{dy}{dt}\right)^2},dt

For a curve traced by parametric equations, this is the form to reach for. The Cartesian formula is just the special case where the parameter is xx itself, so dxdt=1\frac{dx}{dt} = 1 and the root collapses back to 1+(dy/dx)2\sqrt{1 + (dy/dx)^2}.

How Do You Calculate Arc Length Of A Curve? Worked Examples

Each example is fully stepped, and every answer is checked by differentiating the chosen expression back to confirm the integrand. The examples are picked so that 1+(dy/dx)21 + (dy/dx)^2 simplifies cleanly, which is exactly what makes them workable by hand.

Example 1: A curve whose radicand collapses (dy/dx form).

Find the length of y=23x3/2y = \frac{2}{3}x^{3/2} from x=0x = 0 to x=3x = 3.

Differentiate: dydx=23⋅32x1/2=x1/2\dfrac{dy}{dx} = \dfrac{2}{3}\cdot\dfrac{3}{2}x^{1/2} = x^{1/2}, so (dydx)2=x\left(\dfrac{dy}{dx}\right)^2 = x. The integrand becomes clean:

L=∫031+x,dxL = \int_0^3 \sqrt{1 + x},dx

Substitute u=1+xu = 1 + x, so du=dxdu = dx; the limits run from u=1u = 1 to u=4u = 4. This is a short integration by substitution:

L=∫14u1/2,du=[23u3/2]14=23(43/2−1)=23(8−1)=143L = \int_1^4 u^{1/2},du = \left[\frac{2}{3}u^{3/2}\right]_1^4 = \frac{2}{3}\left(4^{3/2} - 1\right) = \frac{2}{3}(8 - 1) = \frac{14}{3}

Check: differentiating 23(1+x)3/2\frac{2}{3}(1+x)^{3/2} gives (1+x)1/2=1+x(1+x)^{1/2} = \sqrt{1+x}, the integrand, so the antiderivative is right.

Final answer: L=143≈4.6667L = \dfrac{14}{3} \approx 4.6667 units.

Example 2: A perfect-square radicand (dy/dx form).

Find the length of y=13(x2+2)3/2y = \frac{1}{3}\left(x^2 + 2\right)^{3/2} from x=0x = 0 to x=3x = 3.

Differentiate with the chain rule: dydx=13⋅32(x2+2)1/2(2x)=x(x2+2)1/2\dfrac{dy}{dx} = \dfrac{1}{3}\cdot\dfrac{3}{2}\left(x^2 + 2\right)^{1/2}(2x) = x\left(x^2 + 2\right)^{1/2}. Square it:

(dydx)2=x2(x2+2)=x4+2x2\left(\frac{dy}{dx}\right)^2 = x^2\left(x^2 + 2\right) = x^4 + 2x^2

Add 11, and the radicand is a perfect square:

1+(dydx)2=x4+2x2+1=(x2+1)21 + \left(\frac{dy}{dx}\right)^2 = x^4 + 2x^2 + 1 = \left(x^2 + 1\right)^2

The root of a perfect square is clean, (x2+1)2=x2+1\sqrt{(x^2+1)^2} = x^2 + 1 (positive on this interval), so the integral is an ordinary polynomial:

L=∫03(x2+1)dx=[x33+x]03=(9+3)−0=12L = \int_0^3 \left(x^2 + 1\right)dx = \left[\frac{x^3}{3} + x\right]_0^3 = \left(9 + 3\right) - 0 = 12

Check: differentiating x33+x\frac{x^3}{3} + x returns x2+1x^2 + 1, the integrand.

Final answer: L=12L = 12 units exactly.

Example 3: A curve in parametric form (the cycloid).

A wheel of radius 11 rolls along a line, and a point on its rim traces a cycloid x=t−sin⁡tx = t - \sin t, y=1−cos⁡ty = 1 - \cos t. Find the length of one full arch, from t=0t = 0 to t=2πt = 2\pi.

Differentiate each coordinate: dxdt=1−cos⁡t\dfrac{dx}{dt} = 1 - \cos t and dydt=sin⁡t\dfrac{dy}{dt} = \sin t. Add the squares:

(dxdt)2+(dydt)2=(1−cos⁡t)2+sin⁡2t=1−2cos⁡t+cos⁡2t+sin⁡2t=2−2cos⁡t\left(\frac{dx}{dt}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{dy}{dt}\right)^2 = (1 - \cos t)^2 + \sin^2 t = 1 - 2\cos t + \cos^2 t + \sin^2 t = 2 - 2\cos t

Using the identity 1−cos⁡t=2sin⁡2(t2)1 - \cos t = 2\sin^2\left(\frac{t}{2}\right), the radicand becomes 4sin⁡2(t2)4\sin^2\left(\frac{t}{2}\right), another perfect square. On [0,2π][0, 2\pi] the value sin⁡(t2)\sin\left(\frac{t}{2}\right) is not negative, so the root is 2sin⁡(t2)2\sin\left(\frac{t}{2}\right):

L=∫02π2sin⁡(t2)dt=[−4cos⁡(t2)]02π=−4cos⁡π+4cos⁡0=4+4=8L = \int_0^{2\pi} 2\sin\left(\frac{t}{2}\right)dt = \left[-4\cos\left(\frac{t}{2}\right)\right]_0^{2\pi} = -4\cos\pi + 4\cos 0 = 4 + 4 = 8

Check: differentiating −4cos⁡(t2)-4\cos\left(\frac{t}{2}\right) gives −4⋅(−sin⁡t2)⋅12=2sin⁡t2-4\cdot\left(-\sin\frac{t}{2}\right)\cdot\frac{1}{2} = 2\sin\frac{t}{2}, the integrand.

Final answer: one arch of the cycloid has length L=8L = 8 units, exactly eight times the wheel's radius.

What Are The Formulas For Arc Length In Every Form?

The four common ways a curve gets described each have their own version of the same integral. This table gathers them in one place.

Table: The arc-length integral in each way a curve can be described.

Curve is given as

Arc length formula

Integrate over

y=f(x)y = f(x)

∫ab1+(dydx)2,dx\displaystyle\int_a^b \sqrt{1 + \left(\frac{dy}{dx}\right)^2},dx

xx from aa to bb

x=g(y)x = g(y)

∫cd1+(dxdy)2,dy\displaystyle\int_c^d \sqrt{1 + \left(\frac{dx}{dy}\right)^2},dy

yy from cc to dd

Parametric x(t),,y(t)x(t),,y(t)

∫t1t2(dxdt)2+(dydt)2,dt\displaystyle\int_{t_1}^{t_2} \sqrt{\left(\frac{dx}{dt}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{dy}{dt}\right)^2},dt

tt from t1t_1 to t2t_2

Polar r=r(θ)r = r(\theta)

∫αβr2+(drdθ)2,dθ\displaystyle\int_{\alpha}^{\beta} \sqrt{r^2 + \left(\frac{dr}{d\theta}\right)^2},d\theta

θ\theta from α\alpha to β\beta

Every row is a distance-formula sum in disguise. Choose the row that matches how the curve is written, and the rest is finding the derivative and evaluating the integral. Arc length is one of the core applications of integration, alongside area and volume.

What If The Arc Length Integral Cannot Be Solved By Hand?

Here is the honest truth textbooks often soften: most arc-length integrals have no elementary antiderivative. The examples above were chosen so that 1+(dy/dx)21 + (dy/dx)^2 collapses to a perfect square or a simple substitution. Change the function slightly and that luck vanishes.

Take the plain cubic y=x3y = x^3 on [0,1][0, 1]. Then dydx=3x2\frac{dy}{dx} = 3x^2 and the length integral is:

L=∫011+9x4,dxL = \int_0^1 \sqrt{1 + 9x^4},dx

There is no elementary function whose derivative is 1+9x4\sqrt{1 + 9x^4}, so no amount of substitution will finish it by hand. You estimate it numerically instead. Using Simpson's rule with four sub-intervals gives L≈1.5482L \approx 1.5482; refining to eight sub-intervals gives L≈1.5478L \approx 1.5478, and finer still keeps converging near 1.54761.5476. A course on numerical integration makes this exact, and the trapezoidal rule is the simpler cousin of Simpson's rule for the same job.

The most famous case is the ellipse. The perimeter of an ellipse cannot be written with elementary functions at all; it defines its own family of elliptic integrals, named precisely because this length resisted every closed-form attempt. When a curve resists integration, that is not a failure of method. It is a reminder that a simple-looking shape can hide an integral no formula can name, which is why numerical tools sit right beside the pencil-and-paper formula.

Why Does The Arc Length Formula Work?

The formula can feel like a trick with square roots until you see the geometry underneath it.

  • A curve is a sum of tiny straight lines. Zoom in far enough on any smooth curve and each piece looks straight. The length of a straight piece is a hypotenuse, and adding hypotenuses is all the integral does.

  • The integrand is a stretch factor. The term 1+(dy/dx)2\sqrt{1 + (dy/dx)^2} answers one question: while xx moves forward by a tiny bit, how much longer is the slanted path the curve takes than that flat horizontal bit? A steeper slope means a longer slanted step, so a larger integrand.

  • It never dips below the straight-line distance. Because 1+(dy/dx)2≥1\sqrt{1 + (dy/dx)^2} \ge 1, the arc length is always at least b−ab - a, matching the fact that the shortest path between two points is the straight one. A curve can only be longer than the chord, never shorter.

Read together, these say the formula is not an arbitrary definition. It is the only sum consistent with measuring length by the distance formula, taken to the limit of infinitely fine pieces.

Who Discovered How To Measure Arc Length?

For most of mathematical history, finding the exact length of a curved line was thought impossible, a problem called rectification, meaning "making straight." Many believed no curved arc could ever equal a whole-number length. The breakthrough came from a young Englishman.

Two more figures completed the picture:

  • Hendrik van Heuraet (c. 1634–1660, Dutch Republic) published a general method for rectifying curves in 1659, turning Neile's single result into a repeatable procedure, one of the direct ancestors of the modern arc-length integral.

  • Christopher Wren (1632–1723, England), better known as the architect of St Paul's Cathedral, found the exact length of one arch of the cycloid, the very curve worked in Example 3 above.

Where Is Arc Length Of A Curve Used In The Real World?

Any time a real quantity follows a curved path, its true length is an arc-length integral.

  • Engineering and construction: the amount of cable in a hanging power line, the steel in a suspension-bridge deck, or the track along a curved railway is the arc length of the curve the structure follows.

  • Roller coasters and roads: designers compute the length of a track or a highway curve to estimate material, travel time, and the forces a rider feels along the bend.

  • Navigation and mapping: the distance along a winding river, coastline, or GPS route is the arc length of the path traced on the map, not the straight-line distance between endpoints.

  • Manufacturing and 3D printing: a cutting tool or a print head following a curved profile travels an arc-length distance, which sets the time and the wear on the machine.

  • Physics: the distance a projectile or an orbiting body covers along its trajectory is the arc length of that trajectory, distinct from its straight-line displacement.

One integral converts "how curvy is this path" into "how long is it," which is why the same formula shows up in a bridge cable and a spacecraft's orbit alike.

What Are The Most Common Mistakes With Arc Length?

These four errors account for most lost marks on arc-length problems, and each matches a question real students ask on r/calculus, r/learnmath, and AP review guides.

Forgetting to square the derivative.

Where it slips in:

A student writes the integrand as 1+dydx\sqrt{1 + \frac{dy}{dx}} instead of 1+(dydx)2\sqrt{1 + \left(\frac{dy}{dx}\right)^2}, dropping the square on the slope.

Don't do this:

Do not put the bare derivative under the root. The derivation squared a leg of a right triangle, so the square is not optional.

The correct way:

Compute dydx\frac{dy}{dx}, then square it before adding 11. For y=23x3/2y = \frac{2}{3}x^{3/2}, the slope is x1/2x^{1/2} and its square is xx, giving 1+x\sqrt{1 + x}, never 1+x1/2\sqrt{1 + x^{1/2}}.

Using the wrong variable for the limits.

Where it slips in:

On a parametric problem a student sets up the integral in tt but plugs in xx-values for the limits, or mixes an xx-integral with yy-bounds.

Don't do this:

Do not let the limits disagree with the variable of integration. A dtdt integral needs tt-limits; a dxdx integral needs xx-limits.

The correct way:

Match them deliberately. For the cycloid arch integrated in tt, the limits are t=0t = 0 and t=2πt = 2\pi, the parameter values at the ends, not the xx-coordinates 00 and 2π2\pi.

Assuming every integral has a closed form.

Where it slips in:

A student expects a clean exact answer and keeps searching for a substitution on an integral like ∫011+9x4,dx\int_0^1 \sqrt{1 + 9x^4},dx that has none.

Don't do this:

Do not force an elementary antiderivative onto a radicand that has none. Most arc-length integrands do not collapse.

The correct way:

Check whether 1+(dy/dx)21 + (dy/dx)^2 simplifies. If it does not, switch to a numerical method such as Simpson's rule and report an approximate length to a stated number of decimal places.

Losing the +1+1 under the root.

Where it slips in:

A student copies the parametric habit into the Cartesian form and writes (dydx)2\sqrt{\left(\frac{dy}{dx}\right)^2}, which just returns the slope and measures nothing.

Don't do this:

Do not drop the 11. Without it, the "length" would be zero on any horizontal stretch, which is wrong.

The correct way:

Keep the constant term: the Cartesian integrand is always 1+(dy/dx)2\sqrt{1 + (dy/dx)^2}. The 11 is the horizontal leg Δx\Delta x that every step of the curve still takes.

Practice Problems On Arc Length Of A Curve

Work each one, then check against the verified answer.

  1. Find the length of y=23x3/2y = \frac{2}{3}x^{3/2} from x=0x = 0 to x=8x = 8.
    (Answer: ∫081+x,dx=[23(1+x)3/2]08=23(27−1)=523≈17.3333\int_0^8 \sqrt{1+x},dx = \left[\frac{2}{3}(1+x)^{3/2}\right]_0^8 = \frac{2}{3}(27 - 1) = \frac{52}{3} \approx 17.3333.)

  2. Find the length of y=13(x2+2)3/2y = \frac{1}{3}(x^2 + 2)^{3/2} from x=0x = 0 to x=1x = 1.
    (Answer: integrand x2+1x^2 + 1, so ∫01(x2+1),dx=13+1=43≈1.3333\int_0^1 (x^2+1),dx = \frac{1}{3} + 1 = \frac{4}{3} \approx 1.3333.)

  3. A curve is given by x=g(y)=23y3/2x = g(y) = \frac{2}{3}y^{3/2} for y=0y = 0 to y=3y = 3. Find its length.
    (Answer: dxdy=y1/2\frac{dx}{dy} = y^{1/2}, so ∫031+y,dy=23(8−1)=143≈4.6667\int_0^3 \sqrt{1+y},dy = \frac{2}{3}(8 - 1) = \frac{14}{3} \approx 4.6667.)

  4. Find the length of the parametric curve x=t2x = t^2, y=t3y = t^3 from t=0t = 0 to t=1t = 1.
    (Answer: ∫014t2+9t4,dt=∫01t4+9t2,dt=127(133/2−8)≈1.4397\int_0^1 \sqrt{4t^2 + 9t^4},dt = \int_0^1 t\sqrt{4 + 9t^2},dt = \frac{1}{27}\left(13^{3/2} - 8\right) \approx 1.4397.)

  5. Set up (do not evaluate) the length of y=exy = e^x from x=0x = 0 to x=1x = 1, and say why it needs a numerical method.
    (Answer: ∫011+e2x,dx\int_0^1 \sqrt{1 + e^{2x}},dx; the radicand has no elementary antiderivative, so use Simpson's rule; the value is about 2.00352.0035.)

  6. Find the length of one arch of the cycloid x=t−sin⁡tx = t - \sin t, y=1−cos⁡ty = 1 - \cos t from t=0t = 0 to t=2πt = 2\pi.
    (Answer: ∫02π2sin⁡t2,dt=8\int_0^{2\pi} 2\sin\frac{t}{2},dt = 8.)

Where Should You Go Next After Arc Length Of A Curve?

Arc length is one branch of using integrals to measure geometry, and several natural doors open from here.

  1. Applications of integration. See how the same integrate-the-tiny-pieces idea gives area, volume, and average value, not just length.

  2. Parametric equations. Master the curves that loop and double back, where the parametric arc-length form is the only one that works.

  3. Numerical integration. Learn Simpson's rule and the trapezoidal rule properly, the tools that finish every arc-length integral no antiderivative can.

  4. If your child is meeting arc length for the first time, a live Bhanzu trainer teaches it from the triangle picture up in the Bhanzu math classes.

Was this article helpful?

Your feedback helps us write better content

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the formula for the arc length of a curve?
For y=f(x)y = f(x) with a continuous derivative on [a,b][a, b], the arc length of a curve is L=∫ab1+(dy/dx)2,dxL = \int_a^b \sqrt{1 + (dy/dx)^2},dx. If the curve is written as x=g(y)x = g(y), integrate 1+(dx/dy)2\sqrt{1 + (dx/dy)^2} with respect to yy instead.
Why do you square the derivative in the arc length formula?
Because each tiny piece of the curve is the hypotenuse of a right triangle with legs Δx\Delta x and Δy\Delta y. The distance formula squares both legs, so the slope dy/dxdy/dx enters the integrand as a square, giving 1+(dy/dx)2\sqrt{1 + (dy/dx)^2}.
How do you find the arc length of a curve given by parametric equations?
Use L=∫t1t2(dx/dt)2+(dy/dt)2,dtL = \int_{t_1}^{t_2} \sqrt{(dx/dt)^2 + (dy/dt)^2},dt. Differentiate x(t)x(t) and y(t)y(t) separately, square each derivative, add them under the root, and integrate over the parameter interval, matching the limits to tt.
Why can't some arc length integrals be solved by hand?
Most radicands of the form 1+(dy/dx)2\sqrt{1 + (dy/dx)^2} have no elementary antiderivative. Only carefully chosen functions make the expression a perfect square or a simple substitution; the rest, such as 1+9x4\sqrt{1 + 9x^4}, must be approximated numerically.
Is arc length always longer than the straight-line distance?
Yes. Since the integrand 1+(dy/dx)2\sqrt{1 + (dy/dx)^2} is never less than 11, the arc length is at least the horizontal span b−ab - a. A curve between two points is always at least as long as the straight chord joining them.
What is the difference between arc length and displacement?
Arc length measures the full distance travelled along the curve, adding up every bend. Displacement measures only the straight-line gap between the start and end points. A winding path can have a large arc length but a small displacement.
✍️ Written By
BT
Bhanzu Team
Content Creator and Editor
Bhanzu’s editorial team, known as Team Bhanzu, is made up of experienced educators, curriculum experts, content strategists, and fact-checkers dedicated to making math simple and engaging for learners worldwide. Every article and resource is carefully researched, thoughtfully structured, and rigorously reviewed to ensure accuracy, clarity, and real-world relevance. We understand that building strong math foundations can raise questions for students and parents alike. That’s why Team Bhanzu focuses on delivering practical insights, concept-driven explanations, and trustworthy guidance-empowering learners to develop confidence, speed, and a lifelong love for mathematics.
Related Articles
Book a FREE Demo ClassBook Now →